Pierce City vs. Stockton Girls Volleyball Tuesday, September 4, 2012 Share Page: Location 906 South Street Stockton, MO 65785-7619 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 2 - 0 (0 - 0, 0 - 0) Junior VarsityJV: Loss 0 - 2 (0 - 0, 0 - 0) Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Pierce City Eagles Stockton Tigers 2 Score 0 0 ‑ 0, 0 ‑ 0 Sets 0 - 0, 0 - 0 District Seed 1 (9) Class Assignment (District) 2 (12) 61.1% Win %Winning Percentage 25.8% 22-10-4 Season Record 8-19-4 8-0 Home Record 1-7 5-3 Away Record 3-5 9-7-4 Neutral/Tourney Record 4-7-4 1.4 Points/Match .7 .8 Points Allowed/Match 1.5 Common Opponents Pierce City Eagles Stockton Tigers Loss (0 - 2) Ash Grove Loss (0 - 2) Win (2 - 0) East Newton Tie (1 - 1) Loss (0 - 2) Fair Grove Loss (0 - 2) Win (2 - 0) Greenfield Loss (1 - 2) Win (2 - 0) Lamar Win (2 - 1) Win (2 - 1) Lockwood Win (2 - 1) Tie (1 - 1) Neosho Tie (1 - 1) Loss (1 - 2) Osceola Loss (1 - 2) Matchup History All-Time Record: (5 - 4) Current Streak: 1 Win Date Location Outcome Score 10/10/2023 Away Win 3 - 0 10/11/2022 Home Loss 2 - 3 10/12/2021 Away Loss 0 - 3 9/2/2014 Away Win 2 - 1 9/10/2013 Home Win 2 - 0 9/4/2012 Away Win 2 - 0 9/6/2011 Home Win 2 - 0 9/7/2010 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/8/2009 Home Loss 1 - 2 10/11/2008 Stockton Invitational 9/9/2008 Away 10/6/2007 Stockton Invitational 9/4/2007 Home Box Score Matchup Comparison at Pierce City Eagles Stockton Tigers 0 Score 2 0 ‑ 0, 0 ‑ 0 Sets 0 - 0, 0 - 0 District Seed 50.0% Win %Winning Percentage 50.0% 6-6 Season Record 3-3 5-1 Home Record 3-1 1-5 Away Record 0-2 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 1.3 Points/Match 1.2 1.2 Points Allowed/Match 1.2 Common Opponents Pierce City Eagles Stockton Tigers Win (2 - 0) Greenfield Win (2 - 1) Win (2 - 0) Lamar Win (2 - 0) 10/11 Lockwood 10/15 Matchup History All-Time Record: (3 - 2 - 1) Current Streak: 2 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 10/10/2023 Away Win 2 - 1 10/11/2022 Home Win 2 - 0 10/12/2021 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/2/2014 Away Win 2 - 0 9/10/2013 Home Tie 1 - 1 9/4/2012 Away Loss 0 - 2 Box Score Box Score Share: