Raytown South vs. Belton Boys Basketball Thursday, February 2, 2012 Share Page: Location 801 W. North Ave. Belton, MO 64012-1885 Directions Levels of Play Boys VarsityV: Win 84 - 58 Boys Junior VarsityJV: TBD Boys Varsity V Boys Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Raytown South Cardinals Belton Pirates 84 Score 58 District Seed 5 (13) Class Assignment (District) 5 (16) 57.7% Win %Winning Percentage 46.2% 15-11 Season Record 12-14 5-0 Home Record 4-3 6-2 Away Record 3-6 4-9 Neutral/Tourney Record 5-5 58.8 Points/Game 49.9 54.2 Points Allowed/Game 53.8 Common Opponents Raytown South Cardinals Belton Pirates Win (63 - 45) Fort Osage Win (74 - 65) Win (55 - 35) Park Hill South Loss (44 - 58) Win (57 - 46) Raytown Win (57 - 48) Win (64 - 57) Ruskin Loss (35 - 65) Win (77 - 59) William Chrisman Win (68 - 66) Win (60 - 36) Winnetonka Loss (51 - 53) Matchup History All-Time Record: (14 - 3) Postseason Record: (1 - 0) Current Streak: 2 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 2/16/2018 Home Win 70 - 38 1/30/2018 Away Win 53 - 41 2/17/2017 Away Loss 72 - 76 1/31/2017 Home Loss 54 - 58 2/12/2016 Away Win 43 - 32 1/26/2016 Home Win 74 - 44 2/13/2015 Home Win 64 - 48 1/27/2015 Away Loss 51 - 52 2/2/2012 Away Win 84 - 58 1/3/2012 Home Win 48 - 35 2/3/2011 Home Win 73 - 34 1/4/2011 Away Win 61 - 26 2/23/2010 Class 5 District 13 Tournament Win 70 - 30 2/2/2010 Home Win 64 - 31 12/14/2009 Away Win 56 - 23 2/3/2009 Away Win 77 - 42 12/15/2008 Home Win 86 - 37 1/25/2008 Home 12/11/2007 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at Raytown South Cardinals Belton Pirates - Score - District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Points/Game - - Points Allowed/Game - Matchup History All-Time Record: (2 - 0) Current Streak: 2 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 2/16/2018 Home 1/30/2018 Away 2/17/2017 Away 1/31/2017 Home 2/12/2016 Away 1/26/2016 Home 2/13/2015 Home 1/27/2015 Away 2/2/2012 Away 1/3/2012 Home 2/3/2011 Home Win 63 - 37 1/4/2011 Away Win 58 - 49 Box Score Box Score Share: