Marceline vs. Salisbury Salisbury Invitational Boys Basketball Monday, January 2, 2023 Share Page: Location Salisbury, MO Directions Levels of Play Boys VarsityV: Loss 32 - 78 Matchup Comparison vs Marceline Tigers Salisbury Panthers 32 Score 78 District Seed 3 (16) Class Assignment (District) 2 (7) 4.0% Win %Winning Percentage 90.6% 1-24 Season Record 29-3 0-9 Home Record 9-1 0-7 Away Record 8-1 1-8 Neutral/Tourney Record 12-1 38.9 Points/Game 65.9 67.5 Points Allowed/Game 44.3 Common Opponents Marceline Tigers Salisbury Panthers Loss (38 - 46) Brookfield Win (70 - 31) Loss (31 - 43) Carrollton Win (87 - 19) Loss (43 - 62) Fayette Win (69 - 27) Loss (28 - 81) Green City Win (78 - 67) Loss (37 - 80) Harrisburg Win (64 - 51) Loss (46 - 64) Knox County Win (57 - 26) Loss (27 - 80) Northeast (Cairo) Win (64 - 45) Loss (36 - 66) Paris Win (62 - 23) Loss (25 - 106) Schuyler County Win (82 - 56) Loss (46 - 51) Scotland County Win (80 - 31) Loss (27 - 77) Westran Win (46 - 44) Matchup History All-Time Record: (3 - 25) Postseason Record: (0 - 1) Current Streak: 9 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 2/6/2024 Away Loss 30 - 89 1/2/2024 Salisbury Invitational Loss 25 - 97 2/7/2023 Home Loss 27 - 93 1/2/2023 Salisbury Invitational Loss 32 - 78 2/8/2022 Away Loss 44 - 70 2/9/2021 Home Loss 39 - 65 2/25/2020 Class 2 District 6 Tournament Loss 65 - 76 2/11/2020 Away Loss 60 - 61 2/9/2019 Home Loss 41 - 56 2/6/2018 Away Win 50 - 35 2/7/2017 Home Loss 46 - 68 1/12/2016 Away Win 62 - 50 12/15/2015 Home Loss 50 - 52 1/13/2015 Home Loss 37 - 66 12/16/2014 Away Loss 21 - 52 1/14/2014 Away Loss 50 - 64 12/17/2013 Home Loss 15 - 59 2/5/2013 Home Loss 36 - 64 12/11/2012 Away Loss 37 - 76 2/7/2012 Away Loss 36 - 68 1/28/2012 Keytesville Tournament Loss 26 - 52 12/13/2011 Home Loss 32 - 67 2/8/2011 Home Loss 48 - 66 12/14/2010 Away Loss 26 - 57 2/9/2010 Away 1/28/2010 Keytesville Tournament Loss 64 - 70 12/15/2009 Home Win 54 - 52 2/10/2009 Home Loss 34 - 41 12/16/2008 Away Loss 49 - 69 2/5/2008 Away 12/11/2007 Home Box Score Box Score Share: