Parkview vs. Republic Boys Basketball Monday, December 18, 2023 Share Page: Location 4370 S RepMo Drive Republic, MO 65738-7570 Directions Levels of Play Boys FreshmanFr: Loss 38 - 62 Boys Junior VarsityJV: Win 77 - 62 Boys Junior Varsity JV Boys Freshman Fr Matchup Comparison at Parkview Vikings Republic Tigers 77 Score 62 District Seed 77.3% Win %Winning Percentage 70.0% 17-5 Season Record 7-3 - Home Record 3-2 9-4 Away Record 3-1 8-1 Neutral/Tourney Record 1-0 60.5 Points/Game 56 49 Points Allowed/Game 49 Common Opponents Parkview Vikings Republic Tigers Win (52 - 40) Bolivar 12/15 Win (58 - 52) Branson 1/30 Win (56 - 42) Central (Springfield) 1/2 Win (102 - 93 (1 OT)) Glendale Loss (66 - 83) Win (64 - 42) Hillcrest Win (63 - 54) Loss (36 - 55) Kickapoo Win (48 - 38) Win (59 - 51) Logan-Rogersville 1/3 Loss (66 - 74) Nixa 12/14 Win (74 - 50) Willard Win (63 - 40) Matchup History All-Time Record: (2 - 1) Current Streak: 2 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 12/18/2023 Away Win 77 - 62 11/28/2022 Willard Boys JV Tournament Win 45 - 44 1/12/2022 Home 1/13/2021 Away Loss 50 - 57 12/12/2017 Home 12/13/2016 Away 12/15/2015 Home 12/16/2014 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at Parkview Vikings Republic Tigers 38 Score 62 District Seed 54.2% Win %Winning Percentage 84.0% 13-11 Season Record 21-4 - Home Record 9-1 7-6 Away Record 7-1 6-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 5-2 40.4 Points/Game 57 40.1 Points Allowed/Game 36.3 Common Opponents Parkview Vikings Republic Tigers Loss (31 - 37) Bolivar Win (64 - 32) Loss (35 - 44) Branson Loss (58 - 63) Win (50 - 23) Central (Springfield) Win (58 - 13) Win (40 - 34) Glendale Win (46 - 38) Win (45 - 41) Hillcrest Win (64 - 35) Loss (26 - 53) Kickapoo Loss (49 - 51) Win (50 - 37) Logan-Rogersville Win (71 - 38) Loss (35 - 61) Nixa Win (58 - 45) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 1) Current Streak: 1 Loss Date Location Outcome Score 12/18/2023 Away Loss 38 - 62 1/12/2022 Home 1/13/2021 Away 1/15/2020 Home 1/24/2019 Away 12/12/2017 Home 12/15/2015 Home 12/16/2014 Away Box Score Box Score Share: