Cassville vs. Lamar Spring Season Baseball Tuesday, April 13, 2010 Share Page: Location 1501 Main St Cassville, MO 65625-1154 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 10 - 1 Junior VarsityJV: TBD Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Cassville Wildcats Lamar Tigers 10 Score 1 District Seed 3 (11) Class Assignment (District) 3 (12) 81.0% Win %Winning Percentage 38.9% 17-4 Season Record 7-11 10-0 Home Record 4-3 5-2 Away Record 2-5 2-2 Neutral/Tourney Record 1-3 8.7 Runs/Game 5.7 3.9 Runs Allowed/Game 7.9 Common Opponents Cassville Wildcats Lamar Tigers Win (10 - 0) Aurora Loss (5 - 8) Win (5 - 3 (8)) Carl Junction Loss (7 - 17) Win (11 - 1) East Newton Win (8 - 1) Win (5 - 4) Monett Loss (3 - 6) Win (8 - 1) Mt. Vernon Loss (1 - 8) Win (9 - 4) Purdy Loss (2 - 12) Win (10 - 0) Seneca Win (21 - 11) Matchup History All-Time Record: (7 - 8) Postseason Record: (1 - 0) Current Streak: 1 Loss Date Location Outcome Score 4/25/2024 Home 4/27/2023 Away Loss 2 - 3 4/26/2022 Home Win 10 - 8 4/27/2021 Away Loss 2 - 8 4/21/2020 Home 4/16/2019 Away Loss 2 - 4 4/19/2018 Away Loss 1 - 11 5/6/2017 Home Win 13 - 6 5/4/2016 Away Loss 7 - 8 4/21/2015 Home Loss 2 - 7 4/15/2014 Home Loss 5 - 11 4/9/2013 Away Loss 1 - 2 5/12/2012 Class 3 District 12 Tournament Win 7 - 2 4/10/2012 Home Win 24 - 1 4/12/2011 Away Win 14 - 7 4/13/2010 Home Win 10 - 1 4/14/2009 Away Win 18 - 6 4/8/2008 Home Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Cassville Wildcats Lamar Tigers - Score - District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Runs/Game - - Runs Allowed/Game - Matchup History All-Time Record: (6 - 1) Current Streak: 1 Loss Date Location Outcome Score 4/25/2024 Home 4/27/2023 Away Loss 0 - 3 4/26/2022 Home Win 7 - 6 4/27/2021 Away 4/21/2020 Home 4/16/2019 Away Win 10 - 5 4/19/2018 Away Win 5 - 3 5/6/2017 Home Win 7 - 4 5/4/2016 Away 4/21/2015 Home 4/15/2014 Home Win 4 - 3 4/9/2013 Away 4/10/2012 Home 4/12/2011 Away Win 13 - 2 4/13/2010 Home 4/14/2009 Away Box Score Box Score Share: