Gainesville vs. Seymour Norwood Tournament Fall Season Softball Saturday, September 24, 2011 Share Page: Location Norwood, MO Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 7 - 4 Matchup Comparison vs Gainesville Lady Bulldogs Seymour Lady Tigers 7 Score 4 District Seed 2 (3) Class Assignment (District) 2 (3) 50.0% Win %Winning Percentage 34.6% 12-12 Season Record 9-17 5-3 Home Record 2-4 2-5 Away Record 5-8 5-4 Neutral/Tourney Record 2-5 7.5 Runs/Game 6.9 7.3 Runs Allowed/Game 7.8 Common Opponents Gainesville Lady Bulldogs Seymour Lady Tigers Win (12 - 1) Alton Win (8 - 2) Win (15 - 8) Conway Win (12 - 1) Win (5 - 4) Dora Win (7 - 6) Win (11 - 1) Fordland Loss (6 - 14) Loss (8 - 11) Forsyth Loss (1 - 3) Loss (1 - 4) Hartville Loss (9 - 15) Win (14 - 10) Koshkonong Win (12 - 0) Loss (3 - 7) Liberty (Mountain View) Loss (7 - 11) Win (14 - 9) Mansfield Loss (8 - 19) Loss (7 - 16) Norwood Loss (3 - 8) Loss (2 - 5) Sparta Win (11 - 5) Matchup History All-Time Record: (14 - 12) Postseason Record: (0 - 1) Current Streak: 8 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/30/2021 Home 9/14/2021 Away Loss 5 - 7 10/1/2020 Away Loss 1 - 15 9/26/2020 Norwood Family Pharmacy Tournament Loss 4 - 11 9/15/2020 Home Loss 5 - 8 10/16/2019 Class 2 District 11 Tournament Loss 10 - 11 10/3/2019 Home Loss 0 - 16 9/28/2019 Norwood Family Pharmacy Tournament Loss 3 - 9 9/17/2019 Away Loss 4 - 14 9/11/2018 Home Win 17 - 2 9/16/2017 Norwood Family Pharmacy Softball Tournament Loss 9 - 10 9/5/2017 Away Loss 8 - 9 8/26/2017 Houston Tournament Loss 6 - 7 10/3/2016 Home Win 13 - 3 10/5/2015 Away Win 12 - 1 9/19/2015 Norwood Softball Tournament Win 10 - 3 10/6/2014 Home Win 12 - 1 9/20/2014 Norwood Varsity Softball Tournament Win 13 - 1 10/7/2013 Away Win 13 - 11 10/1/2012 Home Loss 5 - 6 10/3/2011 Away Win 12 - 5 9/24/2011 Norwood Tournament Win 7 - 4 9/13/2011 Home Win 6 - 1 10/4/2010 Home Win 11 - 2 8/24/2010 Away Win 14 - 6 10/5/2009 Away Win 10 - 0 8/25/2009 Home Win 15 - 0 10/6/2008 Home 8/26/2008 Away 10/1/2007 Away 8/21/2007 Home Box Score Box Score Share: