Marshfield vs. Monett Fall Season Softball Friday, October 2, 2020 Share Page: Location 370 State Hwy DD Marshfield, MO 65706-1501 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Loss 5 - 9 Junior VarsityJV: Loss 3 - 4 Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Marshfield Lady Jays Monett Lady Cubs 5 Score 9 District Seed 4 (5) Class Assignment (District) 4 (6) 16.7% Win %Winning Percentage 48.0% 4-20 Season Record 12-13 2-7 Home Record 2-4 0-7 Away Record 7-2 2-6 Neutral/Tourney Record 3-7 4.2 Runs/Game 5.1 10 Runs Allowed/Game 5.8 Common Opponents Marshfield Lady Jays Monett Lady Cubs Loss (2 - 4) Aurora Win (12 - 2) Win (4 - 3) Cassville Win (10 - 2) Loss (3 - 6) Glendale Loss (1 - 8) Loss (1 - 13) Logan-Rogersville Loss (2 - 3) Loss (0 - 9) McDonald County Loss (4 - 8) Loss (2 - 11) Nevada Loss (9 - 10) Loss (6 - 7 (8)) Reeds Spring Win (7 - 6) Loss (5 - 15) Seneca Win (11 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (1 - 7) Postseason Record: (0 - 2) Current Streak: 2 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 8/29/2023 Away Loss 3 - 8 8/30/2022 Home Loss 1 - 6 8/31/2021 Away Win 14 - 1 10/2/2020 Home Loss 5 - 9 9/3/2019 Away Loss 5 - 15 8/28/2018 Home Loss 2 - 14 10/15/2014 Class 3 State Tournament Loss 0 - 7 10/16/2013 Class 3 State Tournament Loss 2 - 3 Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Marshfield Lady Jays Monett Lady Cubs 3 Score 4 District Seed 0.0% Win %Winning Percentage 60.0% 0-8 Season Record 6-2-2 0-6 Home Record 2-1-1 0-2 Away Record 4-1-1 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 2.9 Runs/Game 5.2 10.6 Runs Allowed/Game 3.8 Common Opponents Marshfield Lady Jays Monett Lady Cubs 9/21 Aurora 9/8 9/14 Cassville 9/15 Loss (3 - 16) Logan-Rogersville Tie (5 - 5) Loss (3 - 14) McDonald County Loss (1 - 9) Loss (7 - 8) Nevada Loss (2 - 3) 9/15 Reeds Spring Win (9 - 0) 9/24 Seneca 9/24 Matchup History All-Time Record: (1 - 4) Current Streak: 1 Win Date Location Outcome Score 8/29/2023 Away Win 10 - 9 8/30/2022 Home 8/31/2021 Away Loss 6 - 7 10/2/2020 Home Loss 3 - 4 9/3/2019 Away Loss 1 - 3 8/28/2018 Home Loss 8 - 14 Box Score Box Score Share: