Weaubleau vs. Osceola Osceola Tournament Boys Basketball Thursday, January 26, 2017 Share Page: Location Osceola, MO Directions Levels of Play Boys VarsityV: Win 56 - 48 Matchup Comparison vs Weaubleau Tigers Osceola Indians 56 Score 48 District Seed 1 (7) Class Assignment (District) 2 (10) 38.5% Win %Winning Percentage 29.2% 10-16 Season Record 7-17 3-4 Home Record 4-2 3-6 Away Record 1-9 4-6 Neutral/Tourney Record 2-6 48 Points/Game 51.2 50.5 Points Allowed/Game 59.8 Common Opponents Weaubleau Tigers Osceola Indians Loss (45 - 56) Appleton City Loss (46 - 60) Win (46 - 27) Climax Springs Win (73 - 55) Loss (45 - 47 (1 OT)) El Dorado Springs Loss (60 - 68) Loss (46 - 62) Fair Play Loss (33 - 76) Loss (46 - 63) Greenwood Loss (32 - 66) Win (48 - 37) Halfway Win (71 - 63) Loss (37 - 67) Hermitage Loss (39 - 85) Loss (52 - 77) Lakeland Loss (52 - 56) Loss (60 - 62) Stockton Loss (34 - 44) Matchup History All-Time Record: (18 - 9) Postseason Record: (3 - 0) Current Streak: 11 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 2/22/2024 Class 2 District 13 Tournament Win 30 - 22 12/4/2023 Home Win 79 - 37 12/5/2022 Away Win 68 - 33 2/22/2022 Class 2 District 13 Tournament Win 56 - 40 12/6/2021 Home Win 64 - 30 2/20/2021 Away Win 78 - 45 2/25/2020 Class 2 District 13 Tournament Win 67 - 34 2/17/2020 Home Win 62 - 33 2/4/2019 Away Win 67 - 25 2/12/2018 Home Win 50 - 36 1/25/2018 Osceola Tournament Win 52 - 36 1/8/2018 56th Annual Skyline Boys' Basketball Tournament Loss 43 - 47 2/6/2017 Away Loss 39 - 50 1/26/2017 Osceola Tournament Win 56 - 48 2/8/2016 Home Loss 51 - 65 1/30/2016 Osceola Tournament Win 57 - 43 2/9/2015 Away Loss 64 - 93 1/31/2015 Osceola Basketball Tournament Loss 57 - 90 1/21/2014 Home Loss 48 - 88 1/24/2013 Osceola Tournament Loss 51 - 75 1/15/2013 Away Loss 59 - 76 1/17/2012 Home Loss 59 - 64 1/18/2011 Away Win 50 - 39 1/18/2011 Away Win 50 - 39 1/25/2010 Osceola Tournament Win 59 - 27 1/19/2010 Home Win 77 - 52 1/20/2009 Away Win 58 - 29 1/25/2008 Osceola Basketball Tournament 1/15/2008 Home Box Score Box Score Share: