Hazelwood East vs. Pattonville Girls Tennis Tuesday, September 11, 2012 Share Page: Location 11300 Dunn Rd St. Louis, MO 63138-1098 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Loss 0 - 9 SophomoreSo: 4:00 pm FreshmanFr: 4:00 pm Varsity V Sophomore So Freshman Fr Matchup Comparison vs Hazelwood East Spartans Pattonville Pirates 0 Score 9 Sets District Seed 2 (5) Class Assignment (District) 2 (6) 15.0% Win %Winning Percentage 62.5% 3-17 Season Record 10-6 1-5 Home Record 5-4 2-2 Away Record 4-1 0-10 Neutral/Tourney Record 1-1 1.4 Points/Match 4.4 4.3 Points Allowed/Match 3 Common Opponents Hazelwood East Spartans Pattonville Pirates Loss (0 - 9) Hazelwood Central Win (6 - 0) Loss (0 - 9) Hazelwood West Win (7 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) McCluer Win (9 - 0) Loss (0 - 9) McCluer North Loss (1 - 5) Loss (1 - 8) Ritenour Win (4 - 0) Win (8 - 1) Riverview Gardens Win (7 - 0) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 7) Current Streak: 7 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/27/2013 League Tourney Loss 0 - 2 9/17/2013 Away Loss 0 - 7 9/14/2012 League Tourney Loss 0 - 2 9/14/2012 League Tourney Loss 0 - 2 9/14/2012 League Tourney Loss 0 - 2 9/14/2012 League Tourney Loss 0 - 2 9/11/2012 Home Loss 0 - 9 9/3/2009 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Hazelwood East Spartans Pattonville Pirates - Score - Sets District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Points/Match - - Points Allowed/Match - Matchup History Date Location Outcome Score 9/3/2015 Away 9/4/2014 Home 9/17/2013 Away 9/5/2013 Away 9/11/2012 Home 8/30/2012 Home 9/1/2011 Away 9/2/2010 Home Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Hazelwood East Spartans Pattonville Pirates - Score - Sets District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Points/Match - - Points Allowed/Match - Matchup History Date Location Outcome Score 9/3/2015 Away 9/4/2014 Home 9/17/2013 Away 9/5/2013 Away 9/11/2012 Home 8/30/2012 Home 9/1/2011 Away 9/2/2010 Home Box Score Box Score Share: