Hazelwood Central vs. University City Girls Volleyball Monday, September 10, 2012 Share Page: Location 7401 Balson Ave St. Louis, MO 63130-2995 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 2 - 0 (25 - 23, 25 - 17) Junior VarsityJV: TBD Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Hazelwood Central Hawks University City Lions 2 Score 0 25 ‑ 23, 25 ‑ 17 Sets 23 - 25, 17 - 25 District Seed 4 (6) Class Assignment (District) 3 (4) 44.4% Win %Winning Percentage 25.0% 12-15 Season Record 7-19-2 3-1 Home Record 3-6-1 4-4 Away Record 1-7 5-10 Neutral/Tourney Record 3-6-1 1 Points/Match .5 1.2 Points Allowed/Match 1.4 Common Opponents Hazelwood Central Hawks University City Lions Loss (0 - 2) Ft. Zumwalt North Loss (0 - 2) Win (2 - 0) Hazelwood East Win (1 - 0) Loss (1 - 2) John Burroughs Loss (0 - 2) Win (2 - 0) McCluer Loss (1 - 2) Win (2 - 0) McCluer North Win (1 - 0) Loss (0 - 2) Parkway North Loss (0 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) Ritenour Loss (0 - 2) Win (2 - 0) Riverview Gardens Win (2 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (10 - 0) Current Streak: 10 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 9/28/2019 Ritenour Invite Win 2 - 0 9/23/2016 Ritenour Invintational Tournament Win 2 - 0 9/27/2014 Ritenour Invitational Win 2 - 0 9/20/2014 NorthSide Invitational Win 2 - 0 9/28/2013 Ritenour Invitation Win 2 - 0 9/16/2013 Home Win 2 - 0 9/22/2012 Ritenour Invite Win 2 - 0 9/10/2012 Away Win 2 - 0 9/25/2010 Ritenour High School Tournament Win 2 - 0 9/25/2010 Ritenour High School Tournament Win 2 - 0 Box Score Matchup Comparison at Hazelwood Central Hawks University City Lions - Score - Sets District Seed 33.3% Win %Winning Percentage - 1-2 Season Record - 1-0 Home Record - 0-2 Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - .3 Points/Match - 1.3 Points Allowed/Match - Common Opponents Hazelwood Central Hawks University City Lions 9/19 Hazelwood East 9/7 9/24 John Burroughs 10/9 9/5 McCluer 9/28 10/3 McCluer North 8/27 Loss (0 - 2) Ritenour 10/5 9/26 Riverview Gardens 10/19 Matchup History Date Location Outcome Score 9/10/2012 Away Box Score Box Score Share: