Penney vs. Polo Scholar Bowl Monday, March 5, 2012 Share Page: Location Gallatin, MO Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 230 - 100 Junior VarsityJV: Win 60 - 40 Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Penney Hornets Polo Panthers 230 Score 100 District Seed 2 (16) Class Assignment (District) 1 (12) 60.0% Win %Winning Percentage 35.7% 6-4 Season Record 5-9 0-2 Home Record 1-1 2-0 Away Record - 4-2 Neutral/Tourney Record 4-8 187 Points/Event 93.9 158.1 Points Allowed/Event 141.4 Common Opponents Penney Hornets Polo Panthers Win (180 - 170) Albany Loss (80 - 170) Win (220 - 210) Gallatin Loss (100 - 250) Win (270 - 140) King City Win (260 - 200) Win (240 - 150) Maysville Loss (220 - 310) Loss (140 - 150) Princeton Loss (70 - 200) Win (260 - 180) South Harrison Loss (90 - 120) Loss (230 - 360) Stanberry Loss (120 - 220) Loss (100 - 120) Worth County Loss (130 - 140) Matchup History All-Time Record: (3 - 3) Postseason Record: (0 - 3) Current Streak: 3 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 4/13/2024 Class 2 District 8 Tournament Loss 160 - 420 4/14/2018 Class 2 District 15 Tournament Loss 270 - 400 4/8/2017 Class 2 District 15 Tournament Loss 280 - 330 3/5/2012 Neutral Win 230 - 100 3/7/2011 Gallatin Win 200 - 50 3/8/2010 Gallatin Win 200 - 100 Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Penney Hornets Polo Panthers 60 Score 40 District Seed 90.9% Win %Winning Percentage 30.0% 10-1 Season Record 3-7 2-0 Home Record - 2-0 Away Record - 6-1 Neutral/Tourney Record 3-7 80 Points/Event 47 51.8 Points Allowed/Event 60 Common Opponents Penney Hornets Polo Panthers Win (40 - 30) Albany Loss (20 - 50) Win (70 - 50) Gallatin Win (50 - 40) Win (120 - 40) King City Loss (10 - 70) Loss (90 - 120) Maysville 3/26 Win (90 - 60) Princeton Loss (10 - 40) Win (140 - 60) South Harrison 3/26 Win (70 - 50) Stanberry Loss (60 - 90) Win (70 - 30) Worth County Win (90 - 50) Matchup History All-Time Record: (2 - 0) Current Streak: 2 Wins Date Location Outcome Score 3/5/2012 Neutral Win 60 - 40 3/5/2012 Neutral Win 60 - 40 Box Score Box Score Share: