North Shelby vs. Putnam County Fall Season Softball Tuesday, September 13, 2011 Share Page: Location 803 S 20th St Unionville, MO 63565-1482 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Loss 0 - 10 VarsityV: TBD 8th Grade8th: TBD Varsity V Varsity V 8th Grade 8th Matchup Comparison at North Shelby Lady Raiders Putnam County Lady Midgets 0 Score 10 District Seed 1 (11) Class Assignment (District) 2 (14) 42.9% Win %Winning Percentage 42.3% 9-12 Season Record 11-15 5-3 Home Record 5-3 1-4 Away Record 2-3 3-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 4-9 4.1 Runs/Game 4.5 6.1 Runs Allowed/Game 5 Common Opponents North Shelby Lady Raiders Putnam County Lady Midgets Loss (2 - 11) Clark County Loss (9 - 10) Loss (1 - 11) Knox County Loss (2 - 3 (10)) Win (3 - 1) Milan Win (10 - 0) Loss (2 - 5) Monroe City Win (3 - 1) Loss (0 - 11) Schuyler County Loss (1 - 10) Loss (4 - 5) Scotland County Win (9 - 4) Matchup History All-Time Record: (2 - 5) Current Streak: 3 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/15/2015 Away Loss 2 - 12 9/16/2014 Home Loss 2 - 6 9/17/2013 Away Loss 0 - 15 9/11/2012 Home Win 2 - 1 9/13/2011 Away Loss 0 - 10 9/14/2010 Home Win 6 - 2 9/15/2009 Away Loss 0 - 12 9/16/2008 Home 9/11/2007 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at North Shelby Lady Raiders Putnam County Lady Midgets - Score - District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Runs/Game - - Runs Allowed/Game - Matchup History Date Location Outcome Score 9/13/2011 Away 9/14/2010 Home 9/15/2009 Away 9/11/2008 Home 9/11/2007 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at North Shelby Lady Raiders Putnam County Lady Midgets - Score - District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Runs/Game - - Runs Allowed/Game - Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 3) Current Streak: 3 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/15/2015 Away Loss 5 - 13 9/16/2014 Home Loss 0 - 12 9/11/2012 Home Loss 2 - 7 9/13/2011 Away 9/14/2010 Home 9/15/2009 Away Box Score Box Score Share: