Marquand-Zion vs. Greenville Girls Volleyball Friday, September 2, 2011 Share Page: Location 178 Walnut St Greenville, MO 63944 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Loss 0 - 2 Junior VarsityJV: 6:00 pm Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Marquand-Zion Lady Tigers Greenville Lady Bears 0 Score 2 Sets District Seed 1 (3) Class Assignment (District) 2 (2) 0.0% Win %Winning Percentage 15.4% 0-23 Season Record 4-18-4 0-7 Home Record 1-4 0-8 Away Record 1-8 0-8 Neutral/Tourney Record 2-6-4 .1 Points/Match .6 2.1 Points Allowed/Match 1.6 Common Opponents Marquand-Zion Lady Tigers Greenville Lady Bears Loss (0 - 2) Bunker Loss (0 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) Leopold Loss (0 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) Meadow Heights Loss (0 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) Oak Ridge Loss (1 - 2) Loss (0 - 2) South Iron Tie (1 - 1) Loss (0 - 3) Zalma Tie (1 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 14) Current Streak: 14 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/11/2023 Away Loss 0 - 3 9/12/2022 Home Loss 0 - 3 9/13/2021 Away Loss 0 - 3 9/16/2019 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/1/2017 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/4/2015 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/5/2014 Home Loss 0 - 2 9/24/2013 Home 9/6/2013 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/24/2012 Away Loss 0 - 2 8/31/2012 Home Loss 0 - 2 9/26/2011 Home Loss 1 - 2 9/2/2011 Away Loss 0 - 2 10/19/2010 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/28/2009 Home Loss 0 - 2 9/29/2008 Away 9/24/2007 Home Box Score Matchup Comparison at Marquand-Zion Lady Tigers Greenville Lady Bears - Score - Sets District Seed 0.0% Win %Winning Percentage 0.0% 0-2 Season Record 0-2 0-1 Home Record - 0-1 Away Record 0-2 - Neutral/Tourney Record - Points/Match 2 Points Allowed/Match 1 Common Opponents Marquand-Zion Lady Tigers Greenville Lady Bears 9/30 South Iron Loss (0 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 2) Current Streak: 2 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/1/2017 Away Loss 0 - 0 9/20/2016 Away 9/2/2016 Home 9/22/2015 Home 9/4/2015 Away 9/23/2014 Away 9/5/2014 Home 9/24/2013 Home 9/6/2013 Away Loss 0 - 2 9/24/2012 Away 8/31/2012 Home 9/26/2011 Home 9/2/2011 Away 10/19/2010 Away 9/28/2009 Home Box Score Box Score Share: