Louisiana vs. Mark Twain Class 3 District 6 Tournament Boys Basketball Monday, February 22, 2021 Share Page: Location 3321 W. Georgia St. Louisiana, MO 63353 Directions Levels of Play Boys VarsityV: Loss 35 - 71 Matchup Comparison vs Louisiana Bulldogs Mark Twain Tigers 71 Score 35 3 District Seed 6 60.9% Win %Winning Percentage 18.8% 14-9 Season Record 3-13 4-2 Home Record 1-4 3-3 Away Record 2-2 7-4 Neutral/Tourney Record 0-7 53 Points/Game 38.6 47.4 Points Allowed/Game 59.4 Common Opponents Louisiana Bulldogs Mark Twain Tigers Win (40 - 37 (1 OT)) Bowling Green Loss (12 - 53) Win (42 - 41) Clopton Loss (28 - 67) Win (57 - 36) Elsberry Loss (39 - 47) Loss (31 - 66) Monroe City Loss (28 - 77) Loss (43 - 62) Montgomery County Loss (32 - 66) Loss (43 - 59) Palmyra Loss (24 - 61) Win (73 - 51) Paris 2/8 - postponed Win (67 - 34) Silex Win (43 - 42) Win (65 - 33) South Shelby Loss (47 - 76) 12/3 - postponed Van-Far Loss (49 - 61) Win (69 - 39) Wright City Loss (46 - 57) Matchup History All-Time Record: (7 - 16) Postseason Record: (0 - 2) Current Streak: 1 Loss Date Location Outcome Score 2/17/2024 Home Loss 50 - 57 1/4/2024 Clopton Hawk Invitational Win 64 - 40 12/4/2023 99th Annual Monroe City Varsity Basketball Tournament Loss 43 - 65 2/17/2023 Away Loss 57 - 77 1/3/2023 Clopton Hawk Invitational Loss 51 - 55 12/5/2022 Monroe City Tournament Loss 54 - 60 12/6/2021 Monroe City Tournament Loss 39 - 72 2/22/2021 Class 3 District 6 Tournament Loss 35 - 71 2/19/2021 Away Loss 41 - 74 2/25/2020 Class 2 District 5 Tournament Loss 39 - 65 2/21/2020 Home Loss 57 - 68 2/15/2019 Away Win 58 - 28 12/4/2018 Monroe City Invitational Win 75 - 71 12/9/2017 Monroe City Tournament Loss 58 - 59 2/7/2014 Away Loss 39 - 65 2/1/2013 Home Win 57 - 46 2/3/2012 Away Loss 54 - 55 2/21/2011 Home Loss 55 - 70 1/24/2011 Bowling Green Invitational Loss 62 - 71 12/11/2010 Monroe City Tournament Loss 54 - 59 2/2/2010 Home Win 55 - 46 1/26/2010 Bowling Green Invitational Win 51 - 41 2/3/2009 Away Win 62 - 35 1/29/2008 Home Box Score Box Score Share: