Charleston vs. Central (New Madrid County) Class 3 District 1 Tournament Girls Basketball Saturday, February 18, 2017 Share Page: Location 505 Burkhart Malden, MO 63863 Directions Levels of Play Girls VarsityV: Win 45 - 31 Matchup Comparison vs Charleston Blue Jays Central (New Madrid County) Lady Eagles 45 Score 31 4 District Seed 5 60.7% Win %Winning Percentage 43.5% 17-11 Season Record 10-13 6-2 Home Record 4-4 4-4 Away Record 2-5 7-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 4-4 56.2 Points/Game 43.4 48.7 Points Allowed/Game 46 Common Opponents Charleston Blue Jays Central (New Madrid County) Lady Eagles Loss (37 - 52) Chaffee Loss (27 - 55) Win (70 - 35) East Prairie Win (54 - 40) Win (62 - 31) Hayti Win (45 - 24) Win (61 - 49) Kelly Loss (57 - 59) Loss (42 - 59) Kennett Loss (14 - 32) Loss (49 - 66) Malden Loss (46 - 63) Loss (45 - 82) Oran Loss (13 - 100) Win (85 - 29) Scott City Win (60 - 20) Loss (47 - 53) Scott County Central Win (45 - 44) Win (38 - 36) Sikeston Loss (35 - 52) Win (70 - 36) South Pemiscot Win (51 - 20) Matchup History All-Time Record: (10 - 11) Postseason Record: (2 - 2) Current Streak: 1 Date Location Outcome Score 2/22/2020 Class 3 District 1 Tournament Forfeit Loss 1/23/2020 Away Loss 45 - 74 2/20/2019 Class 3 District 1 Tournament Loss 38 - 64 1/17/2019 Home Loss 42 - 56 11/17/2018 Pre-Turkey Classic Loss 29 - 71 2/19/2018 Class 3 District 1 Tournament Loss 56 - 60 12/16/2017 Lady Royals Classic Loss 47 - 70 2/18/2017 Class 3 District 1 Tournament Win 45 - 31 1/19/2017 Home Win 64 - 38 12/21/2016 Lady Royals Christmas Classic Win 49 - 46 1/21/2016 Away Loss 53 - 57 12/21/2015 Twin Rivers Lady Royals Tournament Loss 61 - 64 1/22/2015 Home Win 75 - 64 1/23/2014 Away Loss 68 - 76 12/21/2013 Twin Rivers Lady Royals Tournament Loss 82 - 93 1/17/2013 Home Win 75 - 72 1/19/2012 Away Loss 56 - 70 2/2/2011 Home Win 60 - 49 1/21/2010 Away Win 63 - 56 2/28/2009 Class 3 District 1 Tournament Win 62 - 21 1/22/2009 Home Win 55 - 21 12/27/2008 Lady Royals Tournament Win 57 - 19 1/17/2008 Away Box Score Box Score Share: