Raytown South vs. Fort Osage Boys Soccer Tuesday, October 4, 2016 Share Page: Location 25102 East US Hwy 24 Independence, MO 64056 Directions Levels of Play Junior VarsityJV: Loss 0 - 3 VarsityV: Loss 1 - 2 Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Raytown South Cardinals Fort Osage Indians 1 Score 2 District Seed 3 (14) Class Assignment (District) 4 (14) 38.1% Win %Winning Percentage 80.0% 8-13 Season Record 16-3-1 3-6 Home Record 7-1 2-5 Away Record 6-1 3-2 Neutral/Tourney Record 3-1-1 2.5 Goals/Game 2.6 2.7 Goals Allowed/Game .9 Common Opponents Raytown South Cardinals Fort Osage Indians Loss (4 - 5 (1 OT)) Grandview Win (3 - 0) Win (1 - 0) Raytown Win (3 - 2 (PK)) Win (3 - 2) Ruskin Tie (2 - 2) Win (8 - 0) Winnetonka Win (8 - 0) Matchup History All-Time Record: (5 - 8) Current Streak: 4 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/19/2023 Home Loss 0 - 7 9/19/2022 Away Loss 1 - 4 10/3/2017 Home Loss 0 - 1 10/4/2016 Away Loss 1 - 2 9/2/2015 Away Win 2 - 0 9/3/2014 Home Win 3 - 2 10/21/2013 Home Win 2 - 1 10/15/2012 Away Loss 1 - 2 10/13/2011 Away Loss 0 - 6 9/20/2011 Home Loss 1 - 6 10/14/2010 Home Win 1 - 0 9/21/2010 Away Win 2 - 1 10/29/2009 Home 10/5/2009 Away Loss 0 - 1 10/30/2008 Away 10/6/2008 Home 10/25/2007 Away 10/2/2007 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at Raytown South Cardinals Fort Osage Indians 0 Score 3 District Seed 14.3% Win %Winning Percentage 33.3% 1-3-3 Season Record 4-5-3 0-1-1 Home Record 2-3 1-2-2 Away Record 1-0-3 - Neutral/Tourney Record 1-2 2 Goals/Game 1.4 3.4 Goals Allowed/Game 1.5 Common Opponents Raytown South Cardinals Fort Osage Indians Tie (3 - 3) Grandview Win (3 - 1) Tie (1 - 1) Raytown Tie (0 - 0) Tie (2 - 2) Ruskin Tie (0 - 0) Matchup History All-Time Record: (1 - 4) Current Streak: 4 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/19/2023 Home 9/19/2022 Away Loss 0 - 5 10/3/2017 Home Loss 4 - 5 10/4/2016 Away Loss 0 - 3 9/2/2015 Away 9/3/2014 Home 10/21/2013 Home Loss 1 - 3 10/15/2012 Away Win 4 - 1 10/13/2011 Away 9/20/2011 Home 10/14/2010 Home 9/21/2010 Away Box Score Box Score Share: