Park Hill vs. Central (St. Joseph) Girls Basketball Monday, January 26, 2015 Share Page: Location 7701 NW Barry Rd Kansas City, MO 64153 Directions Levels of Play Girls VarsityV: Win 60 - 46 Matchup Comparison vs Park Hill Trojans Central (St. Joseph) Indians 60 Score 46 District Seed 5 (16) Class Assignment (District) 5 (16) 70.0% Win %Winning Percentage 25.0% 21-9 Season Record 6-18 7-2 Home Record 2-6 5-2 Away Record 2-5 9-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 2-7 51.4 Points/Game 42 43.9 Points Allowed/Game 48.3 Common Opponents Park Hill Trojans Central (St. Joseph) Indians Win (51 - 37) Kearney Loss (23 - 38) Loss (37 - 51) Liberty Loss (42 - 61) Win (60 - 25) Oak Park Win (45 - 38) Win (61 - 38) Park Hill South Win (63 - 35) Win (55 - 42) Ruskin Loss (42 - 43) Loss (35 - 46) Smithville Loss (35 - 57) Win (48 - 31) Staley Loss (33 - 45) Loss (49 - 60) Truman Loss (43 - 59) Matchup History All-Time Record: (9 - 16) Postseason Record: (2 - 2) Current Streak: 1 Win Date Location Outcome Score 2/1/2024 Home Win 55 - 16 2/3/2023 Away Loss 37 - 48 12/2/2022 Winnetonka Tournament Loss 47 - 52 3/3/2022 Class 6 District 8 Tournament Loss 39 - 51 12/3/2018 Liberty North Tournament Loss 40 - 56 3/2/2017 Class 5 District 16 Tournament Win 69 - 45 2/18/2016 Home Win 43 - 41 2/2/2016 Northland Classic Loss 37 - 39 1/25/2016 Away Loss 50 - 52 2/19/2015 Away Win 57 - 46 2/2/2015 Northland Classic Win 65 - 48 1/26/2015 Home Win 60 - 46 2/27/2014 Away 2/10/2014 Home Win 48 - 44 2/21/2013 Home 2/4/2013 Away Loss 23 - 45 2/22/2012 Class 5 District 15 Tournament Win 37 - 36 2/9/2012 Away Win 53 - 48 1/9/2012 Home Loss 56 - 58 12/2/2011 Belton Tournament Loss 40 - 49 2/10/2011 Home Loss 32 - 46 1/10/2011 Away Loss 34 - 45 11/30/2010 Fort Osage Tournament Loss 47 - 56 2/25/2010 Class 5 District 16 Tournament Loss 29 - 41 2/1/2010 NKCHS Girls Invitational Loss 41 - 49 2/2/2009 North Kansas City Tournament Loss 37 - 38 12/1/2008 Fort Osage Tourney Loss 33 - 49 2/7/2008 Home 1/28/2008 Fort Osage Tournament 12/17/2007 Away Box Score Box Score Share: