Oak Park vs. Liberty Boys Tennis Thursday, May 3, 2012 Share Page: Location 825 NE 79th Ter Kansas City, MO 64118-1599 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Loss 3 - 6 Junior VarsityJV: Loss 0 - 9 Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Oak Park Northmen Liberty Blue Jays 3 Score 6 Sets District Seed 2 (16) Class Assignment (District) 2 (16) 56.3% Win %Winning Percentage 57.9% 9-7 Season Record 11-8 3-4 Home Record 5-1 5-2 Away Record 3-5 1-1 Neutral/Tourney Record 3-2 4.8 Points/Match 4.6 3.9 Points Allowed/Match 4.2 Common Opponents Oak Park Northmen Liberty Blue Jays Win (5 - 4) Central (St. Joseph) Win (8 - 1) Win (8 - 1) Kearney Win (5 - 0) Win (8 - 1) Lee's Summit Win (7 - 2) Loss (3 - 6) North Kansas City Win (5 - 4) Loss (1 - 8) Park Hill Loss (3 - 6) Win (5 - 4) Park Hill South Win (5 - 4) Loss (3 - 6) Staley Loss (3 - 6) Loss (3 - 6) Truman Win (8 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 8) Postseason Record: (0 - 1) Current Streak: 8 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 3/29/2023 Away Loss 0 - 9 4/19/2016 Away Loss 0 - 9 4/21/2015 Home Loss 0 - 9 4/11/2014 Home Loss 0 - 9 4/5/2013 Away Loss 0 - 9 5/3/2012 Home Loss 3 - 6 5/5/2011 Away Loss 0 - 6 3/31/2010 Home 5/19/2009 Class 2 State Tournament Loss 1 - 5 Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Oak Park Northmen Liberty Blue Jays 0 Score 9 Sets District Seed 12.5% Win %Winning Percentage 57.1% 1-7 Season Record 8-6 1-4 Home Record 4-2 0-3 Away Record 4-4 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 2.6 Points/Match 5.4 6.4 Points Allowed/Match 3.8 Common Opponents Oak Park Northmen Liberty Blue Jays 3/22 Central (St. Joseph) Win (9 - 0) Win (5 - 4) Lee's Summit Win (7 - 2) Loss (1 - 8) Park Hill Win (5 - 4) Loss (4 - 5) Park Hill South Win (8 - 1) Loss (1 - 8) Staley Loss (4 - 5) Loss (4 - 5) Truman Win (8 - 1) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 4) Current Streak: 4 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 4/19/2016 Away Loss 0 - 9 4/21/2015 Home Loss 2 - 7 4/11/2014 Home 4/5/2013 Away Loss 1 - 8 5/3/2012 Home Loss 0 - 9 5/5/2011 Away 3/31/2010 Home Box Score Box Score Share: