Montrose vs. Green Ridge Girls Basketball Tuesday, December 21, 2010 Share Page: Location 307 E 2nd St Montrose, MO 64770-0175 Directions Levels of Play Girls VarsityV: Win 82 - 41 Boys VarsityV: Loss 34 - 41 Boys Junior VarsityJV: TBD Girls Varsity V Boys Varsity V Boys Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Montrose Lady Jays Green Ridge Lady Tigers 82 Score 41 District Seed 1 (7) Class Assignment (District) 1 (8) 96.6% Win %Winning Percentage 53.8% 28-1 Season Record 14-12 9-0 Home Record 4-5 4-0 Away Record 3-2 15-1 Neutral/Tourney Record 7-5 72.3 Points/Game 41.1 30.6 Points Allowed/Game 39.8 Common Opponents Montrose Lady Jays Green Ridge Lady Tigers Win (88 - 18) Calhoun Win (55 - 32) Win (64 - 18) Lakeland Loss (51 - 54) Win (65 - 22) Leeton Loss (32 - 33) Win (77 - 38) Otterville Loss (42 - 51) Matchup History All-Time Record: (4 - 1) Current Streak: 1 Win Date Location Outcome Score 1/19/2023 Neutral Win 47 - 39 12/18/2012 Home Loss 25 - 41 12/20/2011 Away Win 65 - 30 12/21/2010 Home Win 82 - 41 12/22/2009 Away Win 62 - 14 Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Montrose Blue Jays Green Ridge Tigers 34 Score 41 District Seed 1 (7) Class Assignment (District) 1 (8) 47.8% Win %Winning Percentage 51.9% 11-12 Season Record 14-13 4-5 Home Record 3-6 2-2 Away Record 4-1 5-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 7-6 45 Points/Game 59.4 52.7 Points Allowed/Game 57.6 Common Opponents Montrose Blue Jays Green Ridge Tigers Loss (48 - 67) Lakeland Loss (79 - 102) Loss (42 - 55) Leeton Loss (51 - 52) Matchup History All-Time Record: (1 - 3) Current Streak: 3 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 12/18/2012 Home Loss 46 - 65 12/20/2011 Away Loss 40 - 78 12/21/2010 Home Loss 34 - 41 12/22/2009 Away Win 65 - 55 Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Montrose Blue Jays Green Ridge Tigers - Score - District Seed - Win %Winning Percentage - - Season Record - - Home Record - - Away Record - - Neutral/Tourney Record - - Points/Game - - Points Allowed/Game - Matchup History Date Location Outcome Score 12/21/2010 Home 12/22/2009 Away Box Score Box Score Share: