Lee's Summit North vs. Staley Girls Tennis Tuesday, August 28, 2012 Share Page: Location 901 NE Douglas Lee's Summit, MO 64086-4505 Directions Levels of Play VarsityV: Win 9 - 0 Junior VarsityJV: Win 8 - 1 Varsity V Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison vs Lee's Summit North Broncos Staley Falcons 9 Score 0 Sets District Seed 2 (14) Class Assignment (District) 2 (16) 83.3% Win %Winning Percentage 66.7% 20-4 Season Record 10-5 4-1 Home Record 6-2 8-1 Away Record 2-2 8-2 Neutral/Tourney Record 2-1 6.4 Points/Match 5.1 1.9 Points Allowed/Match 3.4 Common Opponents Lee's Summit North Broncos Staley Falcons Win (6 - 3) Central (St. Joseph) Loss (1 - 8) Win (5 - 0) Fort Osage Win (9 - 0) Win (9 - 0) Lee's Summit Win (6 - 3) Win (9 - 0) Liberty Loss (4 - 5) Win (6 - 3) Park Hill South Loss (0 - 9) Win (9 - 0) Raymore-Peculiar Win (7 - 2) Matchup History All-Time Record: (6 - 3) Current Streak: 2 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/18/2023 Away Loss 3 - 6 9/19/2022 Home Loss 3 - 6 8/24/2018 Away Win 5 - 4 9/21/2016 Away Loss 3 - 6 9/3/2013 Away Win 9 - 0 9/15/2012 Liberty/Liberty North Tournament Win 9 - 0 8/28/2012 Home Win 9 - 0 8/30/2011 Away Win 8 - 1 8/31/2010 Home Win 7 - 2 10/5/2009 Home Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Lee's Summit North Broncos Staley Falcons 8 Score 1 Sets District Seed 100.0% Win %Winning Percentage 75.0% 14-0 Season Record 9-3 5-0 Home Record 7-2 9-0 Away Record 2-1 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 8.1 Points/Match 6.4 .9 Points Allowed/Match 2.6 Common Opponents Lee's Summit North Broncos Staley Falcons Win (9 - 0) Central (St. Joseph) Win (7 - 2) Win (9 - 0) Lee's Summit Win (6 - 3) Win (9 - 0) Liberty Win (7 - 2) Win (7 - 2) Park Hill South Win (5 - 4) Win (9 - 0) Raymore-Peculiar Loss (2 - 7) Matchup History All-Time Record: (5 - 2) Current Streak: 2 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/18/2023 Away Loss 3 - 6 9/19/2022 Home Loss 3 - 6 8/24/2018 Away Win 8 - 1 9/21/2016 Away Win 7 - 2 9/3/2013 Away Win 7 - 2 8/28/2012 Home Win 8 - 1 8/30/2011 Away Win 9 - 0 10/5/2009 Home Box Score Box Score Share: