Stockton vs. Strafford Boys Basketball Friday, February 3, 2012 Share Page: Location 201 McCabe St Strafford, MO 65757-8841 Directions Levels of Play Boys VarsityV: Loss 32 - 77 Boys Junior VarsityJV: TBD Boys Varsity V Boys Junior Varsity JV Matchup Comparison at Stockton Tigers Strafford Indians 32 Score 77 District Seed 3 (13) Class Assignment (District) 3 (11) 29.2% Win %Winning Percentage 78.6% 7-17 Season Record 22-6 2-5 Home Record 8-1 0-7 Away Record 6-1 5-5 Neutral/Tourney Record 8-4 50.8 Points/Game 62.1 60.7 Points Allowed/Game 50.5 Common Opponents Stockton Tigers Strafford Indians Loss (42 - 73) Ash Grove Win (48 - 35) Loss (43 - 73) Fair Grove Loss (55 - 58) Loss (32 - 67) Marion C. Early Win (54 - 46) Win (66 - 50) Marionville Win (72 - 43) Loss (48 - 67) Monett Win (64 - 56) Win (59 - 50) Pleasant Hope Win (65 - 40) Loss (45 - 62) Skyline Win (60 - 37) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 13) Current Streak: 13 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 2/5/2021 Home Loss 45 - 49 2/7/2020 Away Loss 47 - 60 2/1/2019 Home Loss 28 - 48 2/2/2018 Away Loss 54 - 67 2/3/2017 Home Loss 53 - 71 2/5/2016 Away Loss 47 - 59 2/6/2015 Home Loss 35 - 72 2/7/2014 Away Loss 39 - 79 2/1/2013 Home Loss 34 - 75 2/3/2012 Away Loss 32 - 77 2/19/2011 Home Loss 47 - 58 2/5/2010 Away Loss 52 - 71 2/6/2009 Home Loss 52 - 64 2/1/2008 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison at Stockton Tigers Strafford Indians - Score - District Seed 0.0% Win %Winning Percentage 100.0% 0-4 Season Record 1-0 0-3 Home Record - 0-1 Away Record 1-0 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 34 Points/Game 68 47 Points Allowed/Game 66 Common Opponents Stockton Tigers Strafford Indians 1/31 Marionville 2/14 Loss (60 - 75) Skyline Win (68 - 66) Matchup History All-Time Record: (0 - 4) Current Streak: 4 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 2/5/2021 Home Loss 22 - 51 2/7/2020 Away Loss 25 - 53 2/1/2019 Home Loss 43 - 49 2/2/2018 Away Loss 27 - 63 2/3/2017 Home 2/5/2016 Away 2/6/2015 Home 2/7/2014 Away 2/1/2013 Home 2/3/2012 Away 2/19/2011 Home 2/5/2010 Away Box Score Box Score Share: