Lamar Middle vs. Cassville with Shell Knob Jr. 11-Man Football Thursday, October 5, 2023 Share Page: Location 503 Maple St. Lamar, MO 64759-1285 Directions Levels of Play 7th Grade7th: Loss 14 - 42 8th Grade8th: Win 16 - 8 8th Grade 8th 7th Grade 7th Matchup Comparison vs Lamar Middle Tigers Cassville Wildcats 16 Score 8 District Seed 66.7% Win %Winning Percentage 40.0% 4-2 Season Record 2-3 3-0 Home Record 1-2 1-2 Away Record 1-1 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 24.5 Points/Game 16.8 17.3 Points Allowed/Game 16 Common Opponents Lamar Middle Tigers Cassville Wildcats Win (28 - 22) Anderson Junior Win (14 - 0) Win (41 - 6) Granby Junior 10/19 Win (34 - 6) Monett MS Win (36 - 12) Loss (22 - 40) Nevada Middle Loss (26 - 28) Loss (6 - 22) Seneca Junior Loss (0 - 24) Matchup History All-Time Record: (4 - 3) Current Streak: 1 Loss Date Location Outcome Score 9/19/2024 Away Loss 8 - 40 10/5/2023 Home Win 16 - 8 9/29/2022 Away Loss 14 - 24 9/23/2021 Home 10/12/2020 Away 9/17/2020 Away Win 36 - 12 9/12/2019 Home Win 56 - 8 10/18/2018 Away Win 34 - 20 9/14/2017 Home 10/17/2016 Away Loss 6 - 28 10/16/2014 Away 9/27/2012 Away Box Score Matchup Comparison vs Lamar Middle Tigers Cassville Wildcats 14 Score 42 District Seed 16.7% Win %Winning Percentage 100.0% 1-4-1 Season Record 5-0 1-2 Home Record 3-0 0-2-1 Away Record 2-0 - Neutral/Tourney Record - 18.3 Points/Game 29.6 27.8 Points Allowed/Game 9.6 Common Opponents Lamar Middle Tigers Cassville Wildcats Loss (12 - 35) Anderson Junior Win (16 - 0) Loss (14 - 22) Granby Junior 10/19 Win (48 - 26) Monett MS Win (28 - 18) Tie (14 - 14) Nevada Middle Win (38 - 16) Loss (8 - 28) Seneca Junior Win (24 - 0) Matchup History All-Time Record: (1 - 5 - 1) Current Streak: 4 Losses Date Location Outcome Score 9/19/2024 Away Loss 14 - 40 10/5/2023 Home Loss 14 - 42 9/29/2022 Away Loss 0 - 26 9/23/2021 Home 10/12/2020 Away 9/17/2020 Away Loss 0 - 16 9/12/2019 Home Tie 0 - 0 10/18/2018 Away Loss 8 - 30 9/14/2017 Home 10/17/2016 Away Win 36 - 6 10/16/2014 Away 9/27/2012 Away Box Score Box Score Share: